Doctor flames Dr. (aka peer review)

[Dman]

If you were ever wondering what a doctorial flame war looks like you could try watching this one go down.
http://www.reefcentral.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=110366
I would advise anyone to not get in the middle of this one :D
Dman
:spin:
p.s. If this is what they mean by peer review, they can have it.

[cavediver]

Yeah,
Thanks I'll get right on that one!!!


:help:

[Dman]

I'll take as being a little to advanced for some to follow, so I moved it here, thanks cavediver

[afss]

damn.. intersting post.. loads of info, but who do you believe?:D

I like the fact that most of it is understandable..

[Dman]

I would have to be a whole lot smarter to even think about jumping in there on that one, who am I kidding, that still wouldn't get me close, I just usually watch from the sidelines and glean from them what I can
Dman
:spin:

[Toirtis]

Heated. Not so much a flame war as an energetic debate....not so far off from when I was defending a couple of my theses in school. It is interesting, but I would need a much better understanding of the subject to form an opinion of just who was more correct....a few references wouldn't hurt, either... ;)

[ajx22]

It is interesting to say the least...

Two of the leaders in providing "new" information in a debate.

Very interesting...but I too will stay on the sidelines.

As my Father used to say:
"It is better to say nothing and be thought a fool, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt". :D

[Dman]

I believe that is what a true debate should look like, heated yet civil. Shows both men are proud of their work.
Dman
:spin: